Not so this year - in fact, my drives to Yorkshire towards the beginning of the month and to Manchester and Liverpool the following weekend were more like bridal processions. It made me wonder if the oak isn't the wrong choice for our national tree. After all, we don't name a month after it, do we? (The first person to say Oaktober will get a hard stare.) And whilst there's no doubting the larger tree's magnificence, the sight of tracts of landscape covered in white, with the occasional, more isolated thorns to mark the old ways really brings home its significance to our ancestors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1882a/1882ad5846aa13144a3911d6cd8fc51179d866a3" alt="".jpg)
Within a week all this glory in Bristol had disappeared, yet when I went up on Dartmoor a full nine days later, it was to find that the may there had yet to blossom fully. It reminded me of how, in the absence of instruments to measure it, time was not as well regulated for our ancestors as it is for us.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66218/66218f6c999faef072e5216373b3db93672b92c6" alt="".jpg)
... but I think the final word on the matter should go to William Wyrcestre, who heard tell from Dynt the Pumpmaker back in 1470s that it was a whitethorn, not an oak that marked the centre of Brygstowe once upon a time, long before the first coming of Bristol High Cross.
No comments:
Post a Comment